Download position paper here.
The steel industry recognises the important role that water plays in its manufacturing operations and also its value to society. Even though the steel industry uses large quantities of water, very little of that water is actually consumed as most is reused or returned to source. For example, sea water is almost exclusively used in cooling operations and the loss during these processes may account for less than 1% of the total due to evaporation. Although the intake is considerable, the water is returned to the sea without any change in quality. Water recycled back into rivers and other sources is often cleaner than when extracted.
In addition to being used in cooling operations, water is required throughout the steelmaking process for descaling, dust scrubbing and other processes. The steel industry uses all types of water. Fresh water availability and quality is a major concern in large parts of the world and the management of water resources is considered to be the most important sustainability challenge after climate change. Fresh water resources are at risk due to demands from a growing global population and increased industrial activity, in particular in developing countries.
The steel industry takes its responsibilities for water management seriously and is constantly evaluating how best to use water, finding improvements both in conservation and reuse. In the same way as steel, water can be reused and recycled, thus improving efficiency of use and reducing demand as well as cost. By increasing water recycling and cascading water use from higher to lower quality, steel producers have been able to reduce their water use and consumption considerably.
Water issues and how they are managed at specific steel plants vary greatly due to local conditions such as water availability, water quality, plant configuration and legislation.
A local approach is necessary
Though almost all activities and areas of the world are facing or will face water challenges, the nature of the challenges varies significantly. They include fresh water scarcity, salinisation, flooding and pollution. Due to this variability, regulatory frameworks need to be tailor-made, taking local conditions such as water availability and discharge options into account. Water management is therefore most effectively regulated by local and/or regional authorities. Typically, regional authorities are best suited to dealing with quantitative issues as these issues concern the entire water basin, whereas local authorities are best suited to dealing with quality issues related to waste water discharge for example. Generic global or continental
measures, in particular if expressed as a reduction in water usage per tonne of product, do not take these local circumstances into account, and might even be counterproductive. They should therefore not be applied at all.
Energy consumption must be considered
The most effective way to reduce water intake is by reusing it. This usually involves cleaning and cooling water flows between each use. Some of
these treatments, such as cooling, require large amounts of energy and can lead to increased rates of water consumption due to greater evaporation.
The additional processes required are nearly always in conflict with objectives to reduce energy consumption or CO2 emissions. It is therefore necessary to assess the effectiveness of water reuse in an integrated manner, taking all environmental aspects into consideration.
Plant configuration considerations
Brownfield versus greenfield sites
Steel plants have a long service life. Their configurations change over the years in order to adapt to new circumstances. The possibility to alter
these sites further is often limited due to space restrictions and/or existing water interdependencies between processes. These limitations should be considered when assessing the water management of a site. Older plants should not be compared to greenfield sites where water consumption considerations were taken into account during the design phase as new plants will be designed for optimal use of resources.
It is generally acknowledged that power generation uses a considerable amount of water, primarily for cooling. When comparing water use at different steel manufacturing sites, it makes a significant difference whether or not the power generation facility is on-site or off-site. All comparisons should be on a like-forlike basis.
Due to the recognised importance of water issues globally, there is a desire to find a method to evaluate the impact caused by products, services and organisations related to water. In many cases, these efforts focus only on water usage rather than on consumption because this is the easiest information to collect. Unfortunately, local aspects, such as availability and quality, are often left out which could lead to a misinterpretation of the true water related impacts.
In order to address all these issues and harmonise the methods, The International Organisation for Standardisation has developed a framework standard for calculating a water footprint (ISO 14046:2014), published in July 2014. The standard is based on the ISO 14040-series for Life Cycle Assessment and defines what requirements are needed to complete a water footprint assessment, including local aspects related to both scarcity and quality. It also covers the full life cycle, including upstream processes. This standard is supported by the global steel industry.
1. Sea water versus fresh water:
Sea water is mainly used for once-through cooling without pre- or post-treatment. It does not come into contact with the material or equipment. Fresh water is mainly used for processes and cooling. It comes into contact with the material and equipment and is treated before reuse or discharge.
2. Water use and water consumption
Water use = water intake